Case 1402840/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Matthew Lloyd v Total Composite Solutions Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402840/2022
- Decision date
- 13 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horder Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Matthew Lloyd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's employer was Total Composite Solutions Ltd, not Mr Brian Harpur as an individual or GRP Solutions Ltd, and the respondent name was corrected by agreement. It also refused the claimant's application to amend the claim to add accrued but unpaid holiday pay from the year ending 2020.
The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as not well founded. The tribunal also dismissed the breach of contract claim arising from an alleged unpaid £5,000 contractual bonus and the claim for unpaid holiday pay. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim concerned an unpaid £5,000 contractual bonus. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal also refused the claimant's application to amend the claim to add accrued but unpaid holiday pay from the year ending 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.