Case 1402848/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cook v Carron Tooling Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402848/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Gray recorded that a determination could properly be made on the papers, and the listed hearing on 11 February 2022 was cancelled.
On the merits, the tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,392.51 gross. It also upheld the claimant's claim in relation to unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £5,832.72 gross.
The judgment does not record any separate award for basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings. The total sum arising from the two payments recorded in the judgment is £7,225.23 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,392.51 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,393 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £5,832.72 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,833 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,225
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.