Case 1402857/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Thomas v Caremark Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402857/2022
- Decision date
- 22 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Gray Date recorded that, by a letter dated 19 November 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss K Thomas an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The reasons state that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The listed hearing fixed for 6 January 2023 was cancelled and did not take place. The judgment does not record any determination of the merits of the underlying claim and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The decision does not state the underlying cause of action in the reasons. The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's 19 November 2022 letter about non-pursuit of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.