Case 1402871/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Lowe in person v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402871/2021
- Decision date
- 27 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss Lowe in person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 January 2022 before Employment Judge Street, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims. The judgment records that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear claims of unfair constructive dismissal, unlawful deduction from earnings, discriminatory constructive dismissal, sex discrimination, pregnancy or maternity discrimination, and a claim in respect of pension contributions because they were presented out of time.
For the unfair constructive dismissal and unlawful deduction from earnings claims, the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to bring the claims in time, so time was not extended. For the discrimination claims, the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. The claim for pension contributions was also outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Judgment refers to 'unfair constructive dismissal'; the tribunal held it was out of time and that the claimant had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Held out of time; the claimant had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time, so time was not extended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Judgment refers separately to 'discriminatory constructive dismissal'; the tribunal held it was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Held out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Held out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Other | The tribunal said it had no jurisdiction in respect of the claim for pension contributions. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable to bring the claims in time
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.