Case 1402894/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Jessica Fitzpatrick v The Trustees of East Stour Village Hall PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402894/2021
- Decision date
- 2 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mrs L Fellows, Mr H Adams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Jessica Fitzpatrick
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Bristol on 17, 18 and 19 April 2023 before Employment Judge Midgley, Mrs L Fellows and Mr H Adams, the tribunal held that Mrs Jessica Fitzpatrick succeeded in her unfair dismissal claim and in her direct sex discrimination claim against The Trustees of East Stour Village Hall. The tribunal dismissed the claim of direct age discrimination and the claim of indirect discrimination on the grounds of age and sex.
The parties then reached agreement on compensation. By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £12,740 inclusive of interest.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct discrimination on the grounds of sex. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Direct discrimination on the grounds of age. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Other | Indirect discrimination on the grounds of age and sex. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,740
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.