Case 1402903/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J A Hayward v Hug-The-Jeweller Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402903/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs J A Hayward
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's employment transferred from the first respondent to the second respondent under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 and that she was unfairly dismissed by the second respondent. The respondents did not appear at the hearing. The written record contains an inconsistency: the opening paragraph states £12,578.67, but the itemised schedule and the recoupment section both give a grand total of £12,758.67.
The tribunal assessed a basic award by reference to 11 years' service, the claimant's date of birth of 25 May 1959, and weekly pay of £190.88. It then allowed compensation for loss to date from 20 August 2019 at 15 weeks' pay of £187.90, future loss of 9 weeks' pay at £187.90, notice pay for 11 weeks at £187.90, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The award was increased by 25% under s.124A Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of items (2) and (3).
The tribunal also awarded £763.52 for failure to give a statement of employment particulars under s.38 Employment Act 2002. The recoupment provisions were stated to apply, with a prescribed element of £6,106.75 for the period from 3 June 2019 to 26 weeks, and an excess over the prescribed element of £6,471.92.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record opens with a total of £12,578.67, but the itemised award schedule and the recoupment section state a grand total of £12,758.67. The latter figure is treated as the operative total. | Upheld | — | £12,759 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,759
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,150
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,077
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.