Case 1402919/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Deane v Greenspace (UK) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402919/2021
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Deane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment note records that the case was heard at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 14 December 2022 before Employment Judge J Bax. It identifies the claimant as Mrs D Deane and the respondent as Greenspace (UK) Limited, and states that both sides were represented by counsel.
The only substantive finding recorded in the extracted text is that, at all times material to the claim, the claimant was disabled by reason of a mental and physical impairment, namely menopause. The note does not record any fuller explanation of the issue, any separate liability findings, or any remedy assessment.
The record also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record states that, at all times material to the claim, the claimant was disabled by reason of a mental and physical impairment, namely menopause. The extracted text does not set out any further liability decision or remedy. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.