Case 1402932/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Tracy Seviour v AND Wessex Tobacco Limited (In Voluntary Creditors Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402932/2019
- Decision date
- 10 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Tracy Seviour
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, issued by Employment Judge N J Roper, records that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment, breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and accrued but unpaid holiday pay were all dismissed. The reason given was that the claimant had failed actively to pursue the claims.
The decision was made in chambers at Plymouth on 9 June 2020. The judgment states that the dismissal followed the reasons explained in the case management order of the same date. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded in the extracted text, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant failed actively to pursue the claim, pursuant to the case management order of 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant failed actively to pursue the claim, pursuant to the case management order of 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was dismissed because the claimant failed actively to pursue it, pursuant to the case management order of 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was dismissed because the claimant failed actively to pursue it, pursuant to the case management order of 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.