Case 1402933/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Michelle Larke-Phillips v BAEMS Ltd t/a Bristol Ambulance EMS — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402933/2021
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millard
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mrs D England, Mrs G Mayo
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Michelle Larke-Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 11 April 2023 before Employment Judge Millard, Mrs D England and Mrs G Mayo. The claimant was Michelle Larke-Phillips and the respondent was BAEMS Ltd t/a Bristol Ambulance EMS.
The judgment records two claims: discrimination on the grounds of sex and discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. Both claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The decision does not record any substantive findings on liability, facts, or remedy beyond that procedural outcome.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no further reasons or legal tests are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the sex discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment records that the sexual orientation discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.