Case 1402935/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Anderson-Stephens v VGMedispa Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402935/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Anderson-Stephens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment only. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 9 November 2019 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations in writing, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the tribunal's direction dated 28 October 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive merits findings or remedy award were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 9 November 2019 to make representations or request a hearing because she had not complied with the tribunal's direction dated 28 October 2019 and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.