Case 1402941/2021 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance v Lysian Retail Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402941/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No appearance
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Exeter by video on 14 January 2022 before Employment Judge Smail. Neither party appeared. The judgment records that the claims were struck out.
The tribunal gave two reasons for strike out. First, it stated that Lysian Retail Ltd does not exist on Companies House. Second, it said the claim had not been actively pursued. No further findings on the merits of the pleaded employment claims were recorded.
The judgment does not record any monetary award or any apportionment between the pleaded claims. Judgment was sent to the parties on 19 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claim, stating that Lysian Retail Ltd does not exist on Companies House and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim, stating that Lysian Retail Ltd does not exist on Companies House and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal struck out the claim, stating that Lysian Retail Ltd does not exist on Companies House and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.