Case 1402944/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Rybakov v Frame Homes (South West) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402944/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Matthews Representation
- Venue
- Bodmin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Rybakov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr I Rybakov brought a claim against Frame Homes (South West) Limited for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20, 21 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010. The hearing was at Bodmin on 27 January 2023 before Employment Judge A Matthews, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The written judgment records only that the claim was presented to the employment tribunal before the end of the period specified in section 123 of the Equality Act 2010. It does not record any findings on liability, any dismissal or upholding of the reasonable-adjustments complaint, or any monetary award. The record also states that oral reasons were given and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment only records that the reasonable-adjustments claim under sections 20, 21 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 was presented before the end of the period in section 123. It does not state a substantive merits outcome. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.