Case 1402951/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Kimber v The Bittern Carpet Gallery Limited - In Voluntary Liquidation and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402951/2019
- Decision date
- 15 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Dated
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs L Kimber
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in case no. 1402951/2019 & 1403030/2019. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 24 October 2019 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 23 September 2019 and had not been actively pursuing the claim.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 17 December 2019 was vacated. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying substantive claims and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The strike-out judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action in the extracted text. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant did not make sufficient representations in response to the 24 October 2019 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.