Case 1402951/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Phillips v Cafe Divino Swindon Ltd t/a Brogans — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402951/2020
- Decision date
- 12 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 13 October 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr D Phillips an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1. The extracted judgment does not set out any substantive determination of the underlying claim on its merits and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim in the extracted text. The gov.uk listing for the case identifies unlawful deduction from wages and working time regulations categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.