Case 1402956/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Luke Miles v Vapor Clean Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402956/2021
- Decision date
- 17 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Luke Miles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningLuke Miles brought a claim against Vapor Clean Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages. The case was heard at Exeter by First Tier Tribunal Judge Volkmer sitting as Employment Judge, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Lee Keet.
The tribunal upheld the claim. It found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages in the amount of £600 and ordered the respondent to repay that sum to the claimant.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested. The judgment does not record any other claims, legal tests, or additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered repayment of £600. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.