Case 1402960/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Johnson Security Ltd (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402960/2020
- Decision date
- 6 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaint that Johnson Security Ltd (In Administration) failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. The judgment concerns employees at the respondent's premises at Unit 2, Orchard Trading Estate, Toddington, Gloucestershire who were dismissed as redundant on or after 11 February 2020.
As a remedy, the tribunal made a protective award in respect of those employees. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on 11 February 2020, or such subsequent dates up to and including 26 February 2020. The judgment does not state a single overall monetary total or split the award into separate sums for individual claimants.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded and made a protective award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- protective award
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.