Case 1402974/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Phillipson v Mr G Deacon — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402974/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Phillipson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol by video link on 3 March 2023 before Employment Judge A Frazer. The judgment records that the claimant’s claims for notice pay, holiday pay and pension contributions were dismissed. It does not set out any detailed reasoning beyond the outcome on those claims.
The tribunal also recorded a successful claim for unauthorised deductions and said the claimant was owed £5,785.50. It further upheld the claim for a redundancy payment and ordered payment of £9,856.83. The total amount due was £15,642.33, payable within 14 days from the date the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment records a dismissed claim for notice pay and does not identify a separate legal label for it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Judgment records a dismissed claim for pension contributions and does not identify a separate legal label for it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states this as the respondent's claim for unauthorised deductions, but also says the claimant is owed £5,785.50. | Upheld | — | £5,786 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £9,856.83. | Upheld | — | £9,857 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,642
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.