Case 1402999/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MR M FEATHER v Phat Burgers (bristol) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402999/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR M FEATHER
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Oldroyd, sitting alone at Exeter by VHS on 29 June 2023, found that PHAT BURGERS (BRISTOL) LIMITED acted in breach of contract by failing to pay the claimant wages, holiday pay and sick pay. The tribunal made awards by way of damages for each head of loss identified in the judgment: £1,170 gross for wages, £610.80 gross for holiday pay, and £496.75 gross for sick pay.
The record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The extracted judgment therefore records the operative findings and the amounts awarded, but does not include any further written reasoning beyond the conclusion that the respondent had breached contract by non-payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay wages, holiday pay and sick pay. Damages were awarded in the sums of £1,170 gross for wages, £610.80 gross for holiday pay, and £496.75 gross for sick pay. | Upheld | — | £2,278 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,278
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.