Case 1403002/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Coates v The Sports Project CIC — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403002/2022
- Decision date
- 24 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hastie Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Coates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Coates issued claims in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 15 September 2022 against The Sports Project CIC. The respondent did not present a valid response on time and did not attend the hearing on 1 August 2023 before Employment Judge Hastie.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, notice pay, and holiday pay succeeded. No further substantive reasons are set out in the published written record.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,625.00 in unpaid wages, £541.67 in notice pay, and £160 in holiday pay, making a total award of £2,326.67. The judgment also notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for unpaid wages / unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,625 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment records this as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £542 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment records this as holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,327
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.