Case 1403007/2019 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v - Mr L Menzies (solicitor) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403007/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by consent, the claims before it were dismissed because it had no jurisdiction to hear them. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service at the date of dismissal, so the statutory jurisdictional requirement was not met.
A separate application for an order that the restrictive covenants in the claimant's contract of employment were unenforceable was also dismissed. The tribunal stated that it had no jurisdiction to determine that issue.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service at the date of dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine the application for an order that the restrictive covenants in the claimant's contract of employment were unenforceable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.