Case 1403007/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Coomber-Moore v Mr D Roder c/o The Wardroom — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403007/2021
- Decision date
- 6 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Coomber-Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss E Coomber-Moore, brought complaints of unfair dismissal and sex discrimination against Mr D Roder c/o The Wardroom. The hearing took place at Bristol by telephone on 24 August 2022 before Employment Judge Livesey, with the claimant appearing in person and supported by her father, and the respondent appearing in person as owner.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and discrimination on the grounds of sex were dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive findings on the merits of either complaint are set out in the written record provided.
The written record also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons will be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard procedure. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the sex discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.