Case 1403008/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Harvey v Lord James Noone t/a Lords and Ladies Hair Design — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403008/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Harvey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the papers after the respondent presented no response. On the information before the Employment Judge, the tribunal found that Lord James Noone t/a Lords and Ladies Hair Design had made unlawful deductions from Miss K Harvey’s wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal awarded Miss Harvey £894.95 and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. No separate remedy components were identified in the judgment, and no other claims or findings were recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the respondent and the tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £895 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £895
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.