Case 1403013/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M A Eke v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403013/2019
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M A Eke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant attended in person and the respondents did not attend. At the outset of the hearing, the claimant withdrew his claims for notice pay and redundancy pay after the tribunal explained that the first respondent's liability was limited to statutory notice and redundancy pay and did not extend to contractual entitlement.
The claimant maintained his holiday pay claim. The tribunal heard his evidence on oath and considered his employment contract and payslips for January to June 2019, which did not record annual leave having been taken during that period.
The tribunal found that the claimant worked full time, had a statutory annual leave entitlement of 11.6 days for 1 January to 31 May 2019, and had already been paid for 8.03 days. With no evidence that he had taken annual leave in that period, the tribunal found a balance of 3.57 days at a gross daily rate of £103.06, and awarded £367.93 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well founded and ordered the first respondent to pay £367.93 gross. | Upheld | — | £368 |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant after the tribunal explained the limits of the first respondent's liability. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The redundancy pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant after the tribunal explained the limits of the first respondent's liability. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £368
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.