Case 1403014/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lewis-Bale of Counsel For the v Mr C Johnson, Tribunal Advocate — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403014/2018
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Lewis-Bale of Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Exeter on 8 October 2019, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded a judgment by consent after the parties said that terms of settlement had been agreed. The tribunal adjourned the case to allow those settlement terms to be implemented.
The judgment provided that, if neither party applied to have the matter relisted before 1 November 2019, the case would stand dismissed as at that date. The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of the substantive claims and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed by the parties and adjourns the case for implementation; the underlying claim type is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment text itself. | Settled | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that terms of settlement had been agreed by the parties and adjourns the case for implementation; the underlying claim type is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment text itself. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.