Case 1403014/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Moran v PGL Travel Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403014/2020
- Decision date
- 15 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Moran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Bristol by video on 14 January 2021 before Employment Judge Livesey, dismissed the claimant's complaints of detriment under s.47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that were identified in paragraphs 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.3 of the Case Management Summary and Order. It found that those complaints were brought out of time and that it had been reasonably practicable for them to have been presented within time.
The judgment did not determine the remaining allegations. It stated that the remaining allegations would proceed in accordance with the Case Management Summary and Order.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment under s.47B ERA 1996 identified in paragraph 2.1.1 of the Case Management Summary and Order; dismissed as out of time because it had been reasonably practicable to present it within time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment under s.47B ERA 1996 identified in paragraph 2.1.2 of the Case Management Summary and Order; dismissed as out of time because it had been reasonably practicable to present it within time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment under s.47B ERA 1996 identified in paragraph 2.1.3 of the Case Management Summary and Order; dismissed as out of time because it had been reasonably practicable to present it within time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.47B ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.