Case 1403040/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Tandy v Beechwood Maintenance Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403040/2019
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Tandy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The Tribunal also noted that, on 11 November 2020, it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not reply and did not give an acceptable reason.
On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim. The entire claim was struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not applied to restore it to the Register of Companies, and the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's request for reasons why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.