Case 1403046/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Joanna Murawska (1st Claimant) Krzystof Murawski (2nd Claimant) v South Coast Skips Limited (in Creditor’s Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403046/2022
- Decision date
- 29 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horder Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Joanna Murawska (1st Claimant) Krzystof Murawski (2nd Claimant)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place in Southampton on 15 June 2023 before Employment Judge Horder, with no attendance for the respondent. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to South Coast Skips Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and dismissed the respondent's application to strike out the claimants' claims for alleged non-compliance with the Unless Order dated 5 January 2023.
The tribunal then dealt only with preliminary time-limit issues. It held that it was not reasonably practicable for both claimants to present their unfair dismissal claims within the statutory time limit and that they were presented within such further time as the tribunal considered reasonable. It also extended time for the 1st Claimant's claim described in the judgment as 'sexual harassment under s.13 Equality Act 2010' because it was just and equitable to do so. The judgment records no substantive merits determination and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it was not reasonably practicable for the 1st Claimant to present her unfair dismissal claim within the statutory time limit and that it was presented within such further time as the tribunal considered reasonable. The judgment records the time limit as 13.9.23 and the further reasonable time as 19.9.23, which is inconsistent with the hearing date. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it was not reasonably practicable for the 2nd Claimant to present his unfair dismissal claim within the statutory time limit and that it was presented within such further time as the tribunal considered reasonable. The judgment records the time limit as 13.9.23 and the further reasonable time as 19.9.23, which is inconsistent with the hearing date. | Other | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal extended time for the 1st Claimant's claim, described in the judgment as 'sexual harassment under s.13 Equality Act 2010', because it was just and equitable to do so. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.