Case 1403049/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Brown v Worthing Pier Amusements Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403049/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Southampton on 26 and 27 October 2020 before Employment Judge Reed sitting alone. The claimant, Mr A Brown, represented himself and the respondent, Worthing Pier Amusements Ltd, was represented by counsel.
The written judgment records a single outcome: the tribunal found that Mr Brown was not unfairly dismissed. No monetary award was made. The judgment does not set out written reasons in the record provided.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states only that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.