Case 1403050/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Churchoranova v De la Haye Restaurants — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403050/2020
- Decision date
- 6 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Churchoranova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Ms H Churchoranova against De la Haye Restaurants. The tribunal recorded five upheld monetary claims and ordered payment of the sums specified in the judgment. Those awards were £560.00 for an unauthorised deduction from wages, £800.00 for notice pay in respect of dismissal in breach of contract, £800.00 as a redundancy payment, and £47.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The tribunal also made a protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found the claimant entitled to the equivalent of 90 days' wages for the protected period beginning on 31 March 2020, quantified at a further £5,142.86. The judgment does not set out any separate findings on liability beyond the short Rule 21 template, and it does not break the award down into basic, compensatory, or interest components.
On the figures stated in the judgment, the total monetary award comes to £7,349.86.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £560.00 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £560 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages equivalent to 2 weeks' wages. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £800.00. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £47.00. | Upheld | — | £47 |
| Trade union | The tribunal awarded a protective award for failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, equivalent to 90 days' wages for the protected period beginning on 31 March 2020. | Upheld | — | £5,143 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.