Case 1403057/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Rodgers v Weydon Multi Academy Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403057/2022
- Decision date
- 27 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mrs K Symonds, Mr P English
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Rodgers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Southampton on 11, 12, 13 and 14 March 2024 before Employment Judge Self, Mrs K Symonds and Mr P English. The claimant was Mr N Rodgers and the respondent was Weydon Multi Academy Trust.
The tribunal dismissed the claims of associative disability discrimination. The judgment records that the direct discrimination and harassment allegations were not well-founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the disability discrimination claims. The judgment records that the section 15 Equality Act 2010 claim and the reasonable adjustments claim were not well-founded. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim described as associative disability discrimination; the judgment records dismissal of the direct discrimination and harassment allegations. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim described as disability discrimination; the judgment records dismissal of the section 15 Equality Act 2010 and reasonable adjustments allegations. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.