Case 1403057/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Anna Davis & Ors v Gareth Webb & Co LLP OC354737 — 2026
- Case reference
- 1403057/2025
- Decision date
- 15 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anna Davis & Ors
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 11 July 2025. Gareth Webb & Co LLP had failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Cadney decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The tribunal upheld the claims specified for each claimant, making awards for unauthorised wage deductions, dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, redundancy payments and unpaid holiday entitlement.
Davis was awarded £392.31 gross for wage deductions, £2,698.42 in notice damages, £7,939.42 in redundancy pay and £833.04 in holiday pay, totalling £11,863.19. Keating was awarded £702.38 gross for wage deductions, £7,749.99 in notice damages and £2,583.40 in holiday pay, totalling £11,035.77.
Fielden was awarded £119 gross for wage deductions, £1,190 in notice damages and £1,361.25 in holiday pay, totalling £2,670.25. Lawson was awarded £509.58 gross for wage deductions, £2,380.95 in notice damages and £3,296.70 in redundancy pay, totalling £6,187.23. Loxton was awarded £234.23 in notice damages and £507.32 in holiday pay, totalling £741.55.
Bartlett was awarded £406 gross for wage deductions, £1,625 in notice damages, £12,187 in redundancy pay and £1,212 in holiday pay, totalling £15,430. Sterring was awarded £133.49 gross for wage deductions, £634.92 in notice damages, £3,081 in redundancy pay and £567.65 in holiday pay, totalling £4,417.06. The tribunal found that Davis, Lawson, Bartlett and Sterring had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and were entitled to redundancy payments.
De-Maria was awarded £726.52 gross for wage deductions, £8,000.01 in notice damages, £24,999.75 in redundancy pay and £953.90 in holiday pay. The judgment states a total of £34,716.18. Wilkins was awarded £97.68 gross for wage deductions, £1,758.24 in notice damages, £1,757.24 in redundancy pay and £1,611.72 in holiday pay. The judgment states a total of £5,225.88. Both were found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy. For each of these two claimants, the stated total differs from the sum of the individual awards; the judgment does not explain those differences.
Dimaria, listed separately under case 1402498/2025, was awarded £274.72 gross for wage deductions, £1,372.62 in notice damages and £1,962 in holiday pay, totalling £3,609.34. The judgment records separate totals for the ten claimants but gives no single combined award.
Claims and outcomes
34 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Davis, case 1403057/2025. Award stated gross. | Upheld | — | £392 |
| Breach of contract | Davis, case 1403057/2025. Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,698 |
| Redundancy | Davis, case 1403057/2025. | Upheld | — | £7,939 |
| Holiday pay | Davis, case 1403057/2025. | Upheld | — | £833 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Keating, case 1401895/2025. Award stated gross. | Upheld | — | £702 |
| Breach of contract | Keating, case 1401895/2025. Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £7,750 |
| Holiday pay | Keating, case 1401895/2025. | Upheld | — | £2,583 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.