Case 1403059/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P McGarry v Innova Design & Build Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403059/2022
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P McGarry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 June 2023, the tribunal gave Mr P McGarry an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the tribunal order dated 18 May 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Rayner struck out the claim. The judgment records the decision as a strike-out only and does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims.
The judgment was dated 25 August 2023 and sent to the parties on 1 September 2023. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out. It does not break out individual underlying claims, although the GOV.UK listing refers to breach of contract, redundancy, unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages and working time issues. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.