Case 1403072/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Ian Moss of the Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403072/2021
- Decision date
- 23 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Lumby Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat remotely on 3 and 4 May 2022 before Employment Judge H Lumby. By consent, the respondent's name was amended to Serco Limited.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims were all dismissed. No separate monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no split of any remedy by claim is given.
The extracted text does not set out detailed reasons for the dismissals, and no additional findings or legal tests are stated in the provided judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separately set out findings for this claim; it states that all the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately set out findings for this claim; it states that all the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separately set out findings for this claim; it states that all the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.