Case 1403073/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Sleeman v Prysm Media Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403073/2020
- Decision date
- 25 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Sleeman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent did not enter a response. Judgment was therefore entered for Mr D Sleeman in respect of his claim for unfair dismissal against Prysm Media Group Ltd.
The tribunal ordered payment of a basic award of £2,265.00 and a compensatory award of £29,344.82. The judgment records that the compensatory award was set out and calculated in the claimant's Schedule of Loss.
The text supplied does not record any contested findings on liability beyond the default judgment procedure, and it does not record any separate findings on other claims, remedies, or legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not enter a response. The award was stated as a basic award of £2,265.00 and a compensatory award of £29,344.82, with the compensatory figure described as calculated in the claimant's Schedule of Loss. | Upheld | — | £31,610 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,610
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,265
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £29,345
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.