Case 1403074/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Atlee v Invinsec Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403074/2019
- Decision date
- 21 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Atlee
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol hearing on 1 October 2019, before Employment Judge Midgley, the claimant appeared in person and the respondents did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal after the respondents had been placed into creditors voluntary liquidation on 5 September 2019.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay was well founded and succeeded. On remedy, the respondents were ordered to pay the claimant £25,000 gross in respect of that breach of contract claim. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal after the respondents were placed into creditors voluntary liquidation on 5 September 2019. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of notice pay succeeded. | Upheld | — | £25,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.