Case 1403075/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Zlotnik v Cool Move Logistics Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403075/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Zlotnik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. By letter dated 24 September 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr K Zlotnik an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive liability finding or remedy assessment was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 37 because the Tribunal considered the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the 24 September 2021 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.