Case 1403095/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Louise Genrey v Star & Garter West Sussex Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403095/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Louise Genrey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Louise Genrey brought claims for unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract against Star & Garter West Sussex Ltd. The respondent did not attend the video hearing because it was in liquidation. The tribunal was satisfied that both complaints had been presented outside the applicable three month time limits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the complaint was presented outside the three month time limit under section 111(2)(a) ERA 1996 and that it had been reasonably practicable to bring it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the complaint was presented outside the three month time limit under Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 and that it had been reasonably practicable to bring it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 111(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Article 7 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.