Case 1403098/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Mall v Mrs Lacia Pearce T/A Crowning Glorie — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403098/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Mall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Midgley heard the case at Bristol on 27 October 2020. The judgment records that the claimant, Miss P Mall, was in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal recorded that the claims were constructive unfair dismissal, breach of contract in respect of notice pay, accrued but unpaid annual leave, and unlawful deductions of earnings in respect of non-payment of the national minimum wage. It then stated that all of those claims were dismissed on their withdrawal by the claimant.
No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in the written judgment, and no award was made. The record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or in writing within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claim of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed on its withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim, in respect of notice pay, was dismissed on its withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued but unpaid annual leave was dismissed on its withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unlawful deductions of earnings in respect of non-payment of the national minimum wage was dismissed on its withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.