Case 1403102/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G J Baldacchino First v MSM Training Ltd Second Respondent: Mark Stephen McLaughlin — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403102/2022
- Decision date
- 13 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Millard Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G J Baldacchino First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment text records only the tribunal's dispositive orders. It dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claims against MSM Training Ltd and against Mark Stephen McLaughlin, with the order referring to gross misconduct and redundancy as the bases addressed in those dismissals.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's breach of contract claims against both respondents. The claim for unlawful deduction of wages was likewise dismissed against both respondents. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text, and no separate reasoning appears beyond the orders themselves.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The order dismisses the unfair dismissal claims against both respondents and refers to gross misconduct and redundancy as the bases addressed in orders 1 to 4. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed against both respondents in orders 5 and 6. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed against both respondents in orders 7 and 8. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.