Case 1403103/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Baker v Equestrian Build UK — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403103/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Baker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 26 September 2022. The Respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages. It held that the Claimant was entitled to the sum of £1,303.
The hearing listed for 14 July 2023 was cancelled. No separate breakdown of remedy components was given in the judgment beyond the award of £1,303.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determination was made under rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded the Claimant £1,303. | Upheld | — | £1,303 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,303
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.