Case 1403107/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ruffle v Innova Design & Build Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403107/2022
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ruffle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr D Ruffle's claim against Innova Design and Build Ltd (In Voluntary Creditor's Liquidation). The judgment records that by letter dated 19 June 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 18 May 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Rayner ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of any underlying claim and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim; it records only that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order of 18 May 2023 and did not actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.