Case 1403117/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Soppelsa v Gmb — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403117/2019
- Decision date
- 18 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Soppelsa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bristol on 17 and 18 August 2020 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The only substantive judgment recorded was that the claimant’s claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. No further reasons were given in the written record because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The tribunal also recorded that no application for costs had been made by the respondent. On that basis, it ordered that the claimant’s deposit of £50 be returned to her. No separate compensatory, basic, or other tribunal award was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. It also ordered return of the claimant's £50 deposit because no costs application was made by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.