Case 1403142/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S. Hornblower (Counsel) v Mr A. Yendole (Solicitor) CONSENT — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403142/2022
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S. Hornblower (Counsel)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in the case of Miss Z Thomson v The Governing Body of the Otter Valley Federation. The judgment records that there was no admission of liability by the Respondent, but the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £10,000 within 21 days.
The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits of the claims. It records that, save for the payment ordered, Employment Tribunal case number 1403142/2022 was to be dismissed.
On the information in the judgment, the case was therefore finally disposed of by consent rather than by a substantive liability decision. No split between heads of loss was given, and no separate remedy components were identified.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Disposed of by consent; the judgment records no admission of liability and contains no merits findings on the disability discrimination claim. | Settled | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Disposed of by consent alongside the other claim; the judgment contains no merits findings on unfair dismissal. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.