Case 1403152/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ryan Nicholson v Trizo Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403152/2020
- Decision date
- 18 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ryan Nicholson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response to the claim was presented by the respondent. Proceeding under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and on the information before Employment Judge Cadney Date, the tribunal found that Mr Ryan Nicholson was unfairly dismissed by Trizo Limited.
The tribunal ordered a basic award of GBP 887.96 and a compensatory award of GBP 11,543.48 for loss of earnings plus GBP 300 for loss of statutory rights. It also made an uplift of GBP 3,257.86 for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice, bringing the total award to GBP 16,289.30.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment; no response to the claim was presented by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £16,289 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,289
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £888
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £11,843
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.