Case 1403153/2022 · Employment Tribunal
ELVIS FORSUH CHENGWA v Ministry of Defence and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403153/2022
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
ELVIS FORSUH CHENGWA
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's claims. The judgment does not set out written reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated period.
The Tribunal struck out the Claimant's claims. No remedy or monetary award was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's claims and that the claims were struck out. It does not identify the specific cause of action in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.