Case 1403164/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person The v Mr D Chard, director — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403164/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person The
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHeard at Exeter on 7 February 2020 before Employment Judge Goraj, the claim between Mr A Smith and Exeter Building Services Limited was disposed of by consent. The judgment records that the respondent would pay the claimant £100 in settlement of his claim within 14 days of the hearing.
The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits of the claim. It states that reasons were announced orally at the hearing, so written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of service of the judgment. The record therefore reflects a consensual settlement only, rather than an adjudication on liability.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment itself records only a consent disposal for £100 and does not identify the underlying cause of action in the text; the claim type is taken from the case listing/context. | Settled | — | £100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £100
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.