Case 1403189/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lance Rosen v AND Mr Keith D Twitchett Trading as The Plume of Feathers — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403189/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lance Rosen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 after the respondent indicated that he did not resist the claims. Judgment was given in chambers at Plymouth on 12 January 2022, and the claimant was not required to attend the later hearing listed for 4 February 2022.
The claimant, Mr Lance Rosen, succeeded in his claim for a statutory redundancy payment. The tribunal awarded £2,267.03, calculated in the judgment as 5 x 1.5 x £302.27.
The claimant also succeeded in his breach of contract claim and was awarded five weeks' notice pay in the sum of £1,511.35. His unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded as well, with the tribunal ordering payment of £1,390.44 for 23 days' accrued but unpaid holiday pay and £281.18 for expenses attributable to the non-payment.
The total amount awarded was £5,450.00. Judgment was sent to the parties on 18 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated by the tribunal as 5 x 1.5 x £302.27. | Upheld | — | £2,267 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as five weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,511 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £1,390.44 for 23 days' accrued but unpaid holiday pay and £281.18 for expenses attributable to the non-payment. | Upheld | — | £1,672 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,450
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.