Case 1403196/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. C. Staddon v Mr. J. Clark — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403196/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barton Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. C. Staddon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr C Staddon’s claim against Mr J Clark at Bristol by video hearing on 25 and 26 July 2023 before Employment Judge Barton. The written judgment records that the claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal for exercising his statutory right to annual leave, unpaid holiday pay, and breach of contract were dismissed.
The claimant’s separate complaint of unpaid notice pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £81.22 less any deductions required by law as the remedy for that claim.
The published record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the judgment itself contains only the outcomes and remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed in the first paragraph of the judgment, which records the complaint as unfair dismissal for exercising the statutory right to annual leave. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of unpaid holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint was dismissed in the same paragraph as the unfair dismissal and holiday pay complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The unpaid notice pay complaint succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £81.22 less any deductions required by law. | Upheld | — | £81 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £81
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.