Case 1403210/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kane v Barclays Bank UK plc PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403210/2019
- Decision date
- 14 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Kane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Southampton on 14 September 2020, Employment Judge Dawson dealt only with limitation and jurisdiction issues. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine it having regard to the date of presentation. No merits findings were made on that claim.
The disability discrimination claim was held to have been presented within such period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. That ruling meant the claim could proceed, but the tribunal did not decide the substantive discrimination issues at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine it having regard to the date of presentation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the claim was presented within such period as it considered just and equitable; the substantive discrimination claim was not determined at this hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.