Case 1403217/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403217/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Lumby Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on whether the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay were in time. The claimant had worked for Greystoke Manor as a dishwasher from 15 December 2021 to 20 May 2022. The claim form was presented on 20 October 2022, following ACAS early conciliation between 27 July 2022 and 11 August 2022, and the tribunal recorded that the three-month limitation period expired at midnight on 5 September 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Preliminary time-limit issue only; the tribunal held the claim was presented within such period as it considered reasonable and could be heard. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Preliminary time-limit issue only; the tribunal held the claim was presented within such period as it considered reasonable and could be heard. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- reasonably practicable
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea BC
- s.207B ERA 1996
- Regulation 30(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.